Skip to main content

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Standards

4 min read

Description of Characteristics:

  • Investor-Focused: SASB Standards are specifically designed to identify and quantify financially material sustainability information for investors and other providers of financial capital.
  • Industry-Specific: SASB Standards are tailored to 77 different industries, recognizing that material ESG issues vary across sectors.
  • Evidence-Based: SASB emphasizes the importance of providing evidence to support sustainability disclosures.
  • Comparable: SASB Standards promote the use of standardized metrics, enhancing comparability across companies within the same industry.

Specific Criteria:

  • Conceptual Framework: Outlines the fundamental concepts and principles underlying SASB’s approach to standard setting.
  • 77 Industry Standards: Each standard identifies the sustainability topics most relevant to financial performance in a specific industry.
  • Metrics: Each standard includes a set of metrics designed to measure and quantify the performance of companies on those topics.
  • Technical Protocols: Provide detailed guidance on how to apply the metrics and collect relevant data.

Reporting Principles:

  • Financial Materiality: SASB prioritizes ESG issues that have a demonstrable impact on a company’s financial performance.
  • Industry-Specific: The standards are tailored to the specific ESG factors that are most relevant to each industry.
  • Evidence-Based: Companies are expected to provide evidence to support their sustainability disclosures.
  • Comparability: Standardized metrics facilitate comparisons across companies within the same industry.
  • Transparency: Clear and concise reporting is encouraged to ensure that information is easily understood by investors and other stakeholders.
  • Conciseness: Reports should be concise and focus on the most material issues.

Reporting Process:

  1. Identify Industry: Determine the relevant SASB industry standard for the company.
  2. Conduct Materiality Assessment: Identify the sustainability topics that are most material to the company’s financial performance.
  3. Collect and Analyze Data: Gather and analyze data related to the identified material topics using the SASB metrics.
  4. Prepare Disclosure: Prepare a sustainability disclosure in accordance with the SASB Standards, providing evidence to support the reported data.
  5. Communicate with Stakeholders: Share the sustainability disclosure with investors and other relevant stakeholders.

Compliance Guidance:

SASB provides implementation guidance and resources to help companies comply with the Standards, including:

  • Implementation Guide: Provides step-by-step guidance on using the SASB Standards.
  • Materiality Map: An interactive tool to help identify material ESG issues.
  • Industry Briefs: Provide insights into the sustainability context of each industry.
  • Technical Bulletins: Address specific reporting challenges and questions.

Connections to Other Frameworks

  • Integration with IFRS: SASB Standards have been consolidated into the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) framework, which aims to develop a global baseline of sustainability-related disclosure standards.
  • Complementary to GRI: While GRI focuses on a broader range of ESG issues, SASB provides a more targeted approach that is relevant to investors.
  • Alignment with TCFD: SASB metrics can be used to support TCFD reporting on climate-related risks and opportunities.

Usability Evaluation:

  • Level of Global Adoption: Increasingly adopted, especially in North America, but less widespread in other regions compared to GRI
  • Ease of Use: Can be relatively straightforward for companies familiar with financial reporting, as it emphasizes quantitative metrics. Industry-specific nature can help focus efforts.
  • Focus Areas: Primarily focuses on financially material ESG issues.
  • Data Availability: Data availability can vary depending on the industry and specific metrics. Some metrics may require additional data collection efforts.

Challenges:

  • Industry-Specific Focus: The industry-specific nature of SASB Standards can make it challenging to compare companies across different sectors.
  • Financial Materiality Emphasis: The focus on financially material ESG issues may not fully address all sustainability concerns relevant to stakeholders.
  • Data Availability: Collecting and reporting on SASB metrics can be challenging for companies that lack robust ESG data management systems.

SyncFrame Compatibility:

  • Complementary Framework: SyncFrame can be used alongside SASB Standards to provide a more comprehensive assessment of ESG performance, going beyond financial materiality to consider broader impacts.
  • Data Integration: SyncFrame’s data collection and reporting tools can be used to collect and analyze SASB-specific metrics.
  • Impact Assessment: SyncFrame’s focus on impact measurement helps to translate SASB’s financially material information into tangible outcomes.
  • Materiality Alignment: SyncFrame’s materiality matrix can be used to further refine SASB’s industry-specific materiality assessments.

Reference Links/Resources:

Leave a Reply

error: Content is protected !!